Because different people will have access to modify the policy and I
can not give them rights to modify only parts of the file.
On 11/28/05, Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman@red-bean.com> wrote:
> On 11/28/05, Carlos Alberto Costa Beppler <beppler@gmail.com> wrote:
> > +1 for a new feature where I can specify that the AuthzSVNAccessFile
> > is a relative path to the repository repository location (using the
> > conf directory as base by example).
> >
> > This can be very useful when using SVNParentPath and delegating the
> > administration of the access control.
> >
> > To not break the compability with existing configuration this could be
> > enabled by adding a new command to mod_authz_svn like
> > "AuthzSVNRelativePath" or something like this.
> >
>
> I don't understand, why do you want separate authz-policy files for
> separate repositories, when you can already control access to *all* of
> them with a single policy file?
>
Received on Tue Nov 29 02:33:07 2005