[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Tarball naming (-nodeps or -withdeps)

From: Max Bowsher <maxb1_at_ukf.net>
Date: 2005-11-18 14:34:22 CET

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Julian Foad wrote:
> Max Bowsher wrote:
>
>>
>> I think we should, instead of producing tarballs named:
>>
>> subversion-1.3.0-nodeps.tar.bz2
>> subversion-1.3.0.tar.bz2
>>
>> ... we should produce tarballs named:
>>
>> subversion-1.3.0.tar.bz2
>> subversion-1.3.0-withdeps.tar.bz2
>>
>>
>> This accomplishes two things:
>
>
> +1.
>
> As for the Windows version, where apparently the deps are almost always
> wanted, I suggest just producing one tarball which has the deps (don't
> know whether its name should indicate that) and not producing a version
> without deps. (There's no point in producing and testing an extra
> version just for symmetry or theoretical niceness if it's hardly ever
> going to be used.)

Totally agree.

1.3.0rc2 has both flavours of the zipfile. I think that isn't worth doing.

Max.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Cygwin)

iD8DBQFDfdhefFNSmcDyxYARAvZ2AKCAMC96napQRuY0b69qb71fR/2B8ACdEUv2
hPPAkPKyZpxW90iyhcbsPKE=
=HoW7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Nov 18 14:37:49 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.