Re: Tarball naming (-nodeps or -withdeps)

Max Bowsher wrote:
>
> I think we should, instead of producing tarballs named:
>
> subversion-1.3.0-nodeps.tar.bz2
> subversion-1.3.0.tar.bz2
>
> ... we should produce tarballs named:
>
> subversion-1.3.0.tar.bz2
> subversion-1.3.0-withdeps.tar.bz2
>
>
> This accomplishes two things:

+1.

As for the Windows version, where apparently the deps are almost always wanted,
I suggest just producing one tarball which has the deps (don't know whether its
name should indicate that) and not producing a version without deps. (There's
no point in producing and testing an extra version just for symmetry or
theoretical niceness if it's hardly ever going to be used.)

- Julian

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Nov 17 03:07:26 2005