On 11/15/05, Erik Huelsmann <ehuels@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11/15/05, Ivan Zhakov <chemodax@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 11/15/05, Branko Čibej <brane@xbc.nu> wrote:
> > > Erik Huelsmann wrote:
> > > > So, I suppose I should be testing trunk on a windows box and see what
> > > > happens if I change svn_io_file_rename...
> > > >
> > > Something bad, I'm pretty sure, or I wouldn't have made the original
> > > commit. :)
> > I have just removed setting destination read-only after rename and all
> > tests passes on Windows (except propt_tests.py 16 which is failling
> > before change).
>
> Could you reduce svn_wc__prep_file_for_replacement to 'return
> SVN_NO_ERROR;' and see if tests still pass? (Yes, with the changed
> svn_io_file_rename please.)
>
> Before deciding to really rip that specific part of the code, it would
> be good to find out if any tests were created to test for the
> semantics Branko is referring to (not necessarily asking you to do
> that though).
All tests pass with no-op svn_wc__prep_file_for_replacement and
changed svn_io_file_rename. What do you think about this?
--
Ivan Zhakov
Received on Tue Nov 15 13:33:23 2005