On 11/9/05, Madan U Sreenivasan <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 09:42, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> > Garrett Rooney <email@example.com> writes:
> > > On 08 Nov 2005 21:43:39 -0600, firstname.lastname@example.org <email@example.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Do you see now the beauty that lies within us all?
> > >
> > > Oh, I'm perfectly willing to admit that it would be cool to have such
> > > a thing, but I think it's overkill considering that our current need
> > > is simply a hook script that writes a string to stderr ;-)
> > "Premature cliché is the root of all evil."
> Thanks for all your comments. I did start off with the simple echo, but
> found that implementing this function that could create a python based
> script portable on windows and unix was as simple as indenting my
> existing code and moving it to svntest.
> So, here it comes, the test itself is simpler, which uses the new
> function added to svntest.main.
> I have not tested this on windows. Could someone do it for me? thanks.
> In case ppl are busy and cant test the script on windows, I'd suggest
> committing the code and wait for the breakage report, because there's no
> extra complexity in the windows code, only that the conditional has not
> been run.
Nice work, Madan! I noticed one small problem:
> + file_append (hook,
> + "@echo off\n",
> + hook_py)
On Windows, we need to call Python scripts using the full path to the
Python interpreter. Here is an example:
file_append(hook, "@%s %s" % (sys.executable, hook.py))
David James -- http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~james
Received on Wed Nov 9 18:18:16 2005