[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn trunk r17244: FAIL (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu static ra_svn fsfs)

From: Madan U Sreenivasan <madan_at_collab.net>
Date: 2005-11-09 18:16:28 CET

On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 09:42, kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> Garrett Rooney <rooneg@electricjellyfish.net> writes:
> > On 08 Nov 2005 21:43:39 -0600, kfogel@collab.net <kfogel@collab.net> wrote:
> >
> > > Do you see now the beauty that lies within us all?
> >
> > Oh, I'm perfectly willing to admit that it would be cool to have such
> > a thing, but I think it's overkill considering that our current need
> > is simply a hook script that writes a string to stderr ;-)
> "Premature cliché is the root of all evil."
Thanks for all your comments. I did start off with the simple echo, but
found that implementing this function that could create a python based
script portable on windows and unix was as simple as indenting my
existing code and moving it to svntest.

So, here it comes, the test itself is simpler, which uses the new
function added to svntest.main.

I have not tested this on windows. Could someone do it for me? thanks.
In case ppl are busy and cant test the script on windows, I'd suggest
committing the code and wait for the breakage report, because there's no
extra complexity in the windows code, only that the conditional has not
been run.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org

Received on Wed Nov 9 18:08:37 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.