Max Bowsher wrote:
> Fabien COELHO wrote:
>> Dear SVN developers,
>>
>> MOTIVATION
>>
>> I find it irritating to have a separate command to check for the
>> revision
>> heterogeneity of a local working copy. The rationnal for 'svnversion' as
>> given in the source file is that it could have been used in the svn
>> building process. Well, it is not, and svnversion does still exists
>> anyway
>> after this patch.
>>
>> MESSAGE
>>
>> Create a 'version' subcommand so that 'svn version' behaves as
>> 'svnversion' does.
>>
>> QUESTIONS
>>
>> I'm not so sure about the details in my patch:
>>
>> - could the functionnality be moved to some library and invoked there
>> by both 'svn' and 'svnversion'? If so, which one?
>
> libsvn_client
>
>> - would the subcommand be better named 'revision/revisions' or some
>> other
>> name? Here there is a subcommand and an option with the same name...
>
> Yes, if we are going to do this, we should *definitely* take the
> opportunity to choose a better name.
Before going on with this patch, I'd like to see some real discussion
about why we want this in svn proper at all. What's wrong with leaving
the functionality in svnversion? I've not seen a single good reason.
And besides, this functionality properly belongs in libsvn_wc, not
libsvn_client.
-- Brane
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Nov 3 02:55:46 2005