[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Sharing libsvn_fs_* internals [was: "Locked" messages useless]

From: Greg Hudson <ghudson_at_MIT.EDU>
Date: 2005-11-03 01:05:39 CET

On Wed, 2005-11-02 at 13:33 +0000, Julian Foad wrote:
> To recap, I'm talking about the two files subversion/libsvn_fs_{base,fs}/err.c
> being almost identical.

Note that most of the functions in libsvn_fs_fs/err.c are not used.
Prior to the addition of lock.c, there were only four uses of the error
helpers in all of FSFS.

Also note that having error helper functions degrades the utility of
file and line numbers in the --enable-maintainer-mode messages, and is
not a practice we use widely outside the FS code.

> It's not just those files. Presumably, if the two filesystems use the same set
> of error messages, then there is much in common in their implementation. I
> haven't looked further in detail.

Although the FSFS code is based off the BDB code, I don't think there's
much code to share (there's a path canonicalization function and some
key generation functions, which shouldn't exist). Much of the shared
logic is at the higher levels ("how to open a path"), but calls out to
different logic at the lower levels ("how to open a node-rev and read
directory entries"). It's possible to share higher-level logic with
lower-level differences, but it tends to be more awkward than sharing
lower-level logic.

Also, there's a fair amount of cleanup which could be done to the FSFS
code which would render a lot of the BDB code vestigial. For instance,
the dag layer doesn't really do much in FSFS, although eliminating it
would take some doing.

> At the moment, while I'd be happy to go the clean, layered, potentially public
> route, I don't think the amount of sharing is large enough to require that, and
> so I'd be happy to put more shared stuff in libsvn_fs which is simpler in the
> short term, as long as we keep our eyes open for the point when it starts to
> get unreasonably complex and do the refactoring then.

We actually did put small amounts of shared code into libsvn_fs
initially, but ran into problems on OSX and Windows.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Nov 3 01:07:37 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.