[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Semantics of svn_wc_is_adm_dir(), and interaction with bindings

From: Mark Phippard <markp_at_softlanding.com>
Date: 2005-10-29 01:18:12 CEST

> Mark, do you think this is still necessary?

I was not following this thread. Is the question just whether the API
ought to take a full path like C:\project\.svn or just a folder name like
.svn? If so, then I think the latter is fine. As you said, it is trivial
to obtain this value from a full path.

I still cannot envision the scenario where I will need this function in
Subclipse anyway. We do very little directly with the WC. We are mostly
calling library functions and these details are buried in there.

Mark

_____________________________________________________________________________
Scanned for SoftLanding Systems, Inc. and SoftLanding Europe Plc by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs.
_____________________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 29 01:18:51 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.