[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Semantics of svn_wc_is_adm_dir(), and interaction with bindings

From: Philip Martin <philip_at_codematters.co.uk>
Date: 2005-10-29 00:24:10 CEST

Daniel Rall <dlr@collab.net> writes:

> On Fri, 28 Oct 2005, Philip Martin wrote:
>> Subeclipse can call svn_path_basename before calling
>> svn_wc_is_adm_dir, is there some reason that it's better for
>> Subversion to do it?
> Well, Subclipse actually has no access to svn_path_basename()

Subeclipse must have some way to manipulate paths, a regexp replace
would do, it doesn't have to use svn_path_basename.

Philip Martin
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 29 00:25:28 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.