On Thu, 27 Oct 2005, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-10-27 at 13:30 +0100, Malcolm Rowe wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 08:19:43AM -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> > > > Looks like the parsing for the new --change option should probably trap
> > > > negative revision numbers in the same way as it traps revision 0:
> > > >
> > > Hmmmmmmmmmmm.
> > > Well, since it's there, should I implement Karl's suggestion of making
> > > it transform -2 into 2:1?
> > >
> >
> > Unsure; we can always add it in as an option later.
> >
> > I think that it might need further discussion, especially in light of
> > Julian's proposal to extend -c to log, etc. (What would 'svn log -c
> > -2' mean, for example?).
> >
>
> Okay, i will prepare a patch to disallow it for now.
+1. I also prefer David's --reverse suggestion to the negative revnum option.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Oct 27 18:53:30 2005