Daniel Rall <dlr@finemaltcoding.com> wrote on 10/20/2005 04:05:35 PM:
> On Thu, 20 Oct 2005, Daniel Rall wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 20 Oct 2005, Branko Čibej wrote:
> > > Daniel Rall wrote:
> ...
> > > >So exposing svn_wc_get_adm_dir() would be sufficient?
> > >
> > > No, it wouldn't be sufficient. You nead at least svn_wc_is_adm_dir,
> > > which is more relevant for hiding stuff.
> >
> > Brane, you suggest this because svn_wc_is_adm_dir() checks not only
the
> > current admin dir, but also the default. I agree; can someone else
put
> > together a patch along the lines of r16854?
>
> Ah well, I fell for it and made the change myself (r16864). I'm
proposing
> both for backport, so some confirmation from a Windows developer would
be
> great (nudge :).
Does this new method take a path, like "C:\Dev\Project\.svn" or just a
name like ".svn"?
In the cases we need this information in Subclipse, I think the other
method will be more desirable.
Thanks
Mark
_____________________________________________________________________________
Scanned for SoftLanding Systems, Inc. and SoftLanding Europe Plc by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs.
_____________________________________________________________________________
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Oct 20 22:11:47 2005