On 10/16/05, Erik Huelsmann <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > > > > 4) Error:
> > > > > test_adm_access(SvnWcTest):
> > > > > Svn::Error::WC_BAD_ADM_LOG: /srv/svntest/svntest/svn/svn_trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/log.c:346 In directory 'test/wc/dir'
> > > > > Error processing command 'set-timestamp' in 'test/wc/dir'
> > > > > Missing 'timestamp' attribute in 'test/wc/dir'
> > > > > /srv/svntest/svntest/svn/svn_trunk/subversion/bindings/swig/ruby/svn/util.rb:58:in `svn_wc_revert2'
> > > > > /srv/svntest/svntest/svn/svn_trunk/subversion/bindings/swig/ruby/svn/util.rb:58:in `revert2'
> > > > > /srv/svntest/svntest/svn/svn_trunk/subversion/bindings/swig/ruby/svn/wc.rb:333:in `revert'
> > > > > /srv/svntest/svntest/svn/svn_trunk/subversion/bindings/swig/ruby/test/test_wc.rb:109:in `test_adm_access'
> > > >
> > > > This looks like it's related to the bug in revert.
> > >
> > > Does r16740 fix the problem?
> > It helps! There are only two errors left now. Reverting the
> > wc-replacements branch merge solves them.
> Ok. r16743 should fix the other revert-related failure. (Does it?)
Yes, it is fixed!
> I don't understand the last failure though.
There is only one problem now. The Ruby bindings replaces a file
called sample2.txt with a file called sample1.txt, and builds a list
of files which are affected by a commit using the "notify_func2"
callback. Before wc-replacements, this list of files was
After wc-replacements, this list of files is:
It looks like you fixed a bug in commit, and the tests have detected
this. If so, I will fix this by simply marking the new list of files
as correct. Should I do this?
David James -- http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~james
Received on Sun Oct 16 16:06:46 2005