[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: swig-rb trunk r16724: FAIL (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu shared)

From: Erik Huelsmann <ehuels_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2005-10-16 09:20:40 CEST

> > > > 4) Error:
> > > > test_adm_access(SvnWcTest):
> > > > Svn::Error::WC_BAD_ADM_LOG: /srv/svntest/svntest/svn/svn_trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/log.c:346 In directory 'test/wc/dir'
> > > > Error processing command 'set-timestamp' in 'test/wc/dir'
> > > > Missing 'timestamp' attribute in 'test/wc/dir'
> > > > /srv/svntest/svntest/svn/svn_trunk/subversion/bindings/swig/ruby/svn/util.rb:58:in `svn_wc_revert2'
> > > > /srv/svntest/svntest/svn/svn_trunk/subversion/bindings/swig/ruby/svn/util.rb:58:in `revert2'
> > > > /srv/svntest/svntest/svn/svn_trunk/subversion/bindings/swig/ruby/svn/wc.rb:333:in `revert'
> > > > /srv/svntest/svntest/svn/svn_trunk/subversion/bindings/swig/ruby/test/test_wc.rb:109:in `test_adm_access'
> > >
> > > This looks like it's related to the bug in revert.
> >
> > Does r16740 fix the problem?
> It helps! There are only two errors left now. Reverting the
> wc-replacements branch merge solves them.

Ok. r16743 should fix the other revert-related failure. (Does it?)

I don't understand the last failure though.

bye,

Erik.
Received on Sun Oct 16 09:21:21 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.