Re: More on possible problem with Neon 0.25.0 [was Re: 1.3.0 RC1 ready to be rolled]

Erik Huelsmann wrote:
> As far as this relates to RC1, I'm very much in favor of just
> rejecting, in order to help speed up the release process. Anything
> else would require much more autoconf magic, which IMO gains us
> little: Neon 0.25.3 is the latest anyway and API+ABI compatible with
> 0.25.0.

Yeah, sure, for RC purposes, just throw in the code to block that one
Neon release. For the final 1.3 release, however, we need to be more
subtle. As pointed out, there are likely to be people out there with
system RPM's that install 0.25.0 and they don't want to rebuild for some
reason.

John

-- 
John Peacock
Director of Information Research and Technology
Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group
4501 Forbes Boulevard
Suite H
Lanham, MD  20706
301-459-3366 x.5010
fax 301-429-5748
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org