Re: libsvn_fs_* make use of functions declared in _private_ libsvn_delta header

On Tue, 2005-10-04 at 14:10 -0500, kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> I've sometimes thought that too, but we mostly seem to have avoided
> the need for it. Can we start out by saying that we have only
> per-library private symbols, fix everything up to see where that
> leaves us, and then decide what to do if any problems remain?

It's a rule which (a) wouldn't buy us much, and (b) would constrain us
in a number of situations. (For example, when we need to introduce a
new function to fix a bug in a 1.2.x release, but we can't extend the
API.) So why advocate for it?

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Oct 4 22:39:12 2005