[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Proposal for $Revision$ keyword amendment

From: Marc Sherman <msherman_at_projectile.ca>
Date: 2005-10-04 17:41:51 CEST

Molle Bestefich wrote:
> David Waite and John Peacock discussed ambiguity related to mixed
> revision working copys.
> My proposal was and still is to simply fill in "mixed" or min:max
> ("100:200") in the event that a mixed revision working copy is
> encountered.
> People that deliberately use mixed revision working copys are not the
> target audience for the feature anyway, so let's not discuss that
> anymore if we can do without :-).

I think you've missed the point about mixed revision working copies.
Running "svn commit" creates a mixed revision WC -- the files committed
will be the new revision, while all other files will be untouched. So
if your feature doesn't target mixed revision WCs, then it doesn't
target anyone who commits.

- Marc

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Oct 4 17:43:21 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.