Re: [PATCH] Was: Enhancement needed in svn status -u

On Thu, 29 Sep 2005, kfogel@collab.net wrote:

> "Daniel L. Rall" <dlr@finemaltcoding.com> writes:
> > We'll have to agree to disagree; knowing in which revision new public fields
> > were added to a data type without having to rely on blame (which is subject
> > to whitespace changes, refactoring, etc.) is absolutely essential. :)
>
> That's information that should be in code comments, not the log
> message. Or more precisely: the information *must* be in the code,
> but (for the purposes you give above) it doesn't matter whether it's
> in the log message or not.

I'm not sure what information you're referring to, Karl. I was referring
to the names of the fields which were added to a data structure.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Sep 30 00:46:14 2005