Re: [PATCH] Was: Enhancement needed in svn status -u

"Daniel L. Rall" <dlr@finemaltcoding.com> writes:
> We'll have to agree to disagree; knowing in which revision new public fields
> were added to a data type without having to rely on blame (which is subject
> to whitespace changes, refactoring, etc.) is absolutely essential. :)

That's information that should be in code comments, not the log
message. Or more precisely: the information *must* be in the code,
but (for the purposes you give above) it doesn't matter whether it's
in the log message or not.

-Karl

-- 
www.collab.net  <>  CollabNet  |  Distributed Development On Demand
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org