If i got you correctly.
xsd it self is a valid xml with a schema, couple with namespace we
could have something more resillient. Xml and xsd will and definiely
evovle from the current version and vocabulaies, but to assume it will
be a mjor breaking changes and requires every single piece of code
technology a total re-write is some thing the consortium will never
do, unless they want to see it dying faceless death like MS
COM did.
On 9/28/05, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
> erymuzuan wrote:
> > RelaxNG is very good, XSD on the other hand is ubiqutos, evry knows
> > them and it's easy to deal with versioning( the time will come when
> > DTD will not be able to deal with versioning efficeintly as XSD). As
> > Subversion client and it's output will change from version to version,
> > XSD seemed to be a better bet that DTD.
>
> How does XSD help with versioning XML vocabularies???
>
> > ...
>
> Best regards, Julian
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Sep 28 15:59:01 2005