[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Right place for cleaning up entries fields on delete

From: Ivan Zhakov <chemodax_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2005-09-23 00:30:49 CEST

On 9/23/05, Philip Martin <philip@codematters.co.uk> wrote:
> Erik Huelsmann <ehuels@gmail.com> writes:
> > BTW: which part of the 'remove copyfrom-url and copyfrom-rev' do you
> > consider non-atomic? Modifying an entry is done with 1 call into
> > svn_wc__modify_entry.
> I don't know whether Ivan's change would have introduced an atomic
> problem, it's quite possible his change will be been OK. If he thinks
> svn_wc_delete2 is the best place to do then he may be right.
My opinion that in any case no atomic problems will be indroduced.
After discussion I can restate my question: Is this logic (about
cleanuping fields) should applied for all situation when scheduled
modifed from replaced to deleted or only when entry deleted by

Ivan Zhakov
Received on Fri Sep 23 00:31:43 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.