[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: "svn diff" and "svn log" timestamp weirdness

From: Branko ─îibej <brane_at_xbc.nu>
Date: 2005-09-01 09:28:09 CEST

Greg Hudson wrote:

>On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 19:24 -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>>The only case I can come up with is co/up that would fit that scenario
>>where we have to pick a single revision.
>blame, cat, copy, export, info, ...
>brane is proposing a pretty deep architectural change here.
It isn't all that deep a change. Where a revision range really doesn't
make sense, you'd just pick either the first or the last revision in the
range. I've no opinion at this time about which choice is better, except
that it would probably be a good thing if the choice were consistent for
all commands. :)

(blame could reasonably be taught to work on a revision range, since
'svn blame -rX' already means 'svn blame -rx:HEAD', but that's a
separate issue.)

-- Brane

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Sep 1 09:28:53 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.