[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: File Locking on Win9x, and FSFS repositories

From: Branko ─îibej <brane_at_xbc.nu>
Date: 2005-08-19 07:42:17 CEST

Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:

> On Aug 18, 2005, at 6:03 PM, Max Bowsher wrote:
>> If not for compatibility, yes, that would be the way to do it, BUT
>> there is a problem. The lockfile is located outside the db/
>> directory, which is the the "fs" which is handled by libsvn_fs. In
>> other words, a svn repository is a libsvn_fs FS nested within a
>> libsvn_repos "repos", and it would be a violation of the layered
>> design for the inner layer to assume things about the implementation
>> of the outer layer.
> So why can't libsvn_fs_base create a new 'lockfile' inside repos/db/,
> and start doing all the shared/exclusive locking on that? The
> lockfile sitting outside repos/db/ won't be created at all for new
> repositories, and will just bit-rot in older repositories.

He has a point, though. If you access the repository with a 1.3
mod_dav_svn and a 1.2 svnadmin at the same time, the locking won't work
correctly (even if the repository format didn't change otherwise).

Can we forbid this according to our compatibility rules? I don't know...
We'd certiainly have to bump the repository format version.

-- Brane

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Aug 19 07:43:14 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.