Re: [PATCH] Issue #1935: svn status too verbose with svn:externals definitions

On Fri, 12 Aug 2005, Julian Foad wrote:

> > If you feel strongly about the "printing from two
> > places" issue I might be able to elminate the need for making the
> > batons "public" and drop my "-v -q" extension to the original issue.
>
> I still don't like having the code to print it split between two different
> places, but leave it in for now and I'll see if I can find a way to combine
> them. (Sharing just the text of the message would be a half-way house.)
>
As a maintainer of sv.po, I can say that we have lots of places where we
duplicate text strings. Just look at the offsets in a .po file... I'm not
saying that I love duplicate, but introducing some kind of abstraction if
the only duplicated thing is a string might be over-kill.

Thanks,
//Peter

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Aug 12 15:35:03 2005