Scott Palmer <scott.palmer@2connected.org> writes:
> Interesting, but I fear that issue is going too far for what I want.
>
> It seems that issue 1935 proposes to suppress ALL info about
> externals unless the "-v" option is given. In which case the output
> would be the same as it is now with a bunch of "empty" status info.
>
> I want to get status output for externals that actually have some
> status to report. But I don't want the "Performing status on
> external item at..." message when the status for that external item
> would be empty.
>
> Am I clearly communicating the difference?
Yes; sorry for not realizing that before.
I think your enhancement is basically different from what issue #1935
discusses, though if your enhancement were implemented, it would
reduce the urgency of #1935 by a lot. You might want to make a note
of this thread in #1935, therefore.
If you want to file an enhancement issue, pointing to this thread,
that would be great, but without a patch I fear it might linger for a
long time. Tell you what: if you have time to come up with a patch,
and send it to the dev@ list, I'll at least do a full review. I can't
promise to commit it the first time obviously, but it shouldn't be a
huge patch, and once we get it ship-shape (however many turnarounds
that takes) I see no reason it can't be committed. I've CC'd the dev@
list in case anyone has objections.
Don't forget to read
http://subversion.tigris.org/mailing-list-guidelines.html#patches
and the relevant parts of
http://subversion.tigris.org/hacking.html
-Karl
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Aug 4 23:09:47 2005