[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Some WC improvements

From: Peter N. Lundblad <peter_at_famlundblad.se>
Date: 2005-08-02 22:17:58 CEST

On Mon, 1 Aug 2005, Philip Martin wrote:

> Branko ?ibej <brane@xbc.nu> writes:
>
> > We put emtpy-file in there because IIRC it was shown that creating it
> > for every diff did have a significant impact on speed. It might be
> > that "it was shown" incorrectly;
>
> I put it in, it just seemed the natural thing to do when I was writing
> the diff code. The reduced IO seemed important at the time because I
> wasn't aware quite how much other IO went on in libsvn_wc.
>
If I'm changing this, I'm planning to create one empty file per diff (and
only if it is needed, possibly). Can that I/O really be measurable? That
might be what your saying above; just pointing out that I'm not going to
create an empty-file per added/deleted file if that wasn't obvious.

Thanks,
//Peter

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Aug 2 22:21:24 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.