Re: [PATCH] new feature: takeover

Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman@collab.net> writes:

> On Aug 1, 2005, at 8:34 AM, Mark Phippard wrote:
>
> >
> > Are you against the feature altogether, or just the idea of a new
> > subcommand? I believe all of the discussion on this feature has
> > gravitated towards it being a new option on the checkout command
> > instead
> > of a command in its own right.
>
> My feelings are
>
> 1. this is a good idea, a useful new feature. very much in demand.
>
> 2. it should be a switch, not a subcommand.
>
> 3. it should not reimplement rsync, it should just re-download the
> *whole* file in those cases where the local checksum doesn't match
> the server's checksum.

These are basically my feelings, too, though perhaps this behavior
should be the default for checkout?

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Aug 1 23:17:43 2005