Re: [PATCH] Improve error checking for rev-prop commands (incl. issue #2364)

Julian Foad wrote:
> Issue #2364 says "--revprop doesn't work with -r BASE/COMMITTED/PREV but
> [does] with HEAD".
>
> My analysis is that there are two issues here.
>
> 1. It was never intended that a working copy item should be specified as
> the target for operating on a revision property. It is accepted, but
> the documentation doesn't mention it: the help says "[URL]". Therefore
> there is no reason why a revision should be able to be specified
> relative to a WC target.

This won't block custom revprops from being set (issue 1976), will it? I
guess as long as the `svn propset --revprop` syntax isn't used to set
them, it won't be an issue.

-- 
Ben