Re: [Patch] Issue #2291 - 'svn ls -v' should return locking information - V3
From: Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman_at_collab.net>
Date: 2005-07-06 20:26:38 CEST
On Jul 6, 2005, at 6:47 AM, Alexander Thomas wrote:
> Sorry, forgotten to attach patch, resending ...
Alex, thanks for your patience!
I'm glad you've placed an svn_lock_t structure into svn_dirent2_t, it
Unfortunately, now we're faced with two choices, neither of which is
* do a network request to get the dirents, then do N more network
or
* do a network request to get the dirents, then do one more
After some discussion in the Chicago office, we all agree that's it's
Lundblad is right: we need to make svn_ra_get_locks() take a depth
In the meantime, svn_ra_get_locks() was designed to return a whole
So what we'd like to see is
1. a new iteration of this patch which call svn_ra_get_locks()
...then, after we've applied the patch, if you're up for it:
2. a completey new patch to
(a) make svn_ra_get_locks() use a streamy 'callback' interface,
(b) make svn_ra_get_locks() take a boolean 'recurse' argument
Does this all make sense to folks?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.