[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Subversion & FAT failures

From: Erik Huelsmann <e.huelsmann_at_gmx.net>
Date: 2005-06-28 23:49:45 CEST

Hi Peter,

> > It would also greatly increase 'svn st' speed in case filestamps don't
> > match. In the current scenario, the file must be 'detranslated' to be
> > able to check its size against the size stored in the .svn/entries
> > file. Storing the WC file size would eliminate the need for that step
> > in many situations (ie where a change resulted in a file size change).
> >
> I've been thinking about this, but I'm not sure this will "greatly improve
> svn status" because most files are note modified in a typical situation.
> So, for most files, you'll get equal file sizes and a forced
> byte-by-byte-comparisons. Or do I miss something?

Nope, you're entirely correct.



Weitersagen: GMX DSL-Flatrates mit Tempo-Garantie!
Ab 4,99 Euro/Monat: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Jun 28 23:50:57 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.