[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Subversion & FAT failures

From: Carl Karsten <carl_at_personnelware.com>
Date: 2005-06-27 17:48:18 CEST

Branko Čibej wrote:
> Carl Karsten wrote:
>
>> Branko Čibej wrote:
>>
>>> Carl Karsten wrote:
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, not being able to run our test suite on FAT made me raise my
>>>>> priority
>>>>> on the issue, but generally, yes, there are other important fixes
>>>>> to be
>>>>> made.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> How hard would it be to fix the tests, with a note in the bug report
>>>> to unfix them if the bug is ever addressed. I am guessing this is
>>>> what the "increase sleep 1 to 2" comments were about.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Fixing tests to hide a bug isn't exactly productive.
>>
>>
>>
>> In this case I think it is.
>>
>> We could call it "making the tests more realistic."
>
>
> You're assuming that scripted clients aren't a realistic useage
> scenario, and I think the assumption is just a trifle naïve.
>

Fill me (and perhaps Erik) in - What is the use case for a script that would be
impacted by this bug?

Carl K

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Jun 27 17:48:10 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.