[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Subversion & FAT failures

From: Branko Čibej <brane_at_xbc.nu>
Date: 2005-06-27 07:25:04 CEST

Carl Karsten wrote:

> Branko Čibej wrote:
>
>> Carl Karsten wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>>> Well, not being able to run our test suite on FAT made me raise my
>>>> priority
>>>> on the issue, but generally, yes, there are other important fixes
>>>> to be
>>>> made.
>>>>
>>>
>>> How hard would it be to fix the tests, with a note in the bug report
>>> to unfix them if the bug is ever addressed. I am guessing this is
>>> what the "increase sleep 1 to 2" comments were about.
>>
>>
>>
>> Fixing tests to hide a bug isn't exactly productive.
>
>
> In this case I think it is.
>
> We could call it "making the tests more realistic."

You're assuming that scripted clients aren't a realistic useage
scenario, and I think the assumption is just a trifle naïve.

-- Brane

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Jun 27 07:26:07 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.