[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [PATCH]: issue #2264 - multiple locks over ra_svn - v3

From: <kfogel_at_collab.net>
Date: 2005-06-02 17:05:28 CEST

VK Sameer <sameer@collab.net> writes:
> I think the points you made in this email would be useful, namely,
> - Poolnames being hints to reviewers of pool usage.
> - O(1) leakage vs. O(N) leakage in case of SVN_ERR causing a return
> from the function without cleaning up a pool created there.
> - the previous point also might help reduce worry about mixing and
> matching various pools in a function.
> - Using the incoming pool for data that is persistent throughout
> the function.
> I've probably edited your email badly in my response. My apologies if
> I've misinterpreted your comments.

No, these are all accurate reflections of what I was trying to say.
Thanks for the summary. In r14932, I expanded that section in HACKING.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Jun 2 18:07:59 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.