[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r14482 - in trunk/subversion: mod_dav_svn

From: Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman_at_collab.net>
Date: 2005-05-10 15:04:27 CEST

On May 10, 2005, at 7:25 AM, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> What the heck? We should be using APR_USEC_PER_SEC, right? I
> thought it was 'milli' for some reason. Is this a big bug?

More importantly, why doesn't our lock_tests.py 'expiration date'
test not notice this problem?

Ah, it's only the log message that's borked, never mind. Our code
*is* using APR_USEC_PER_SEC to convert between time_t and apr_time_t
after all.

Sorry for the panic. Nothing to see here, move along.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue May 10 15:06:46 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.