Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
>
> On May 7, 2005, at 12:03 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
>
>> On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 01:57:57PM -0500, kfogel@collab.net wrote:
>>
>>> What would we say to rolling rc3 on Monday? Ben Reser, does that work
>>> for you? That would give us the weekend to vote on pending STATUS
>>> items (of which there are currently 10, but only 2 or 3 have any
>>> complexity to them).
>>>
>>> Assuming no showstoppers, rc3 would be the final candidate,
>>> essentially identical to 1.2.0, which would be released one week
>>> later. Of course, were we to find a bug in rc3 severe enough to
>>> warrant rc4, that would re-start the 1-week resoak.
>>>
>>
>> Monday evening works for me.
>>
>
> Great. So if breser posts tarballs on Monday evening (U.S.
> timezones), then hopefully we'll have enough signatures to announce
> rc3 sometime on Tuesday.
>
> I'm little annoyed at the 2-3 day delays we've been having between
> rolling and announcing the tarballs; maybe that's just the price of
> our new signature-policy. But my impression is that we seem to get
> three signatures for the .gz and .bz2 tarballs within a few hours,
> and it's the win32 .zip files that are causing the multi-day delays.
> Maybe we just don't have enough people who can build/test on
> Windows? At the least, maybe Branko, Erik and I can prepare our
> Windows systems ahead of time so that we know we're ready to run
> tests on Monday night...?
I think it's the lack of Windows developers that's delaying us, yes.
Unfortunately, nobody else seems to be active right now. The TSVN guys
seem not to be using our tarballs, so we can't get help from there.
Maybe living with two sigs for the .zip would be enough...
Anyway, aren't Erik and you using the same box for testing? Do you test
once and sign twice?
-- Brane
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat May 7 20:34:46 2005