[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Subversion 1.2.0 RC3 (final candidate) on Monday?

From: Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman_at_collab.net>
Date: 2005-05-07 19:10:15 CEST

On May 7, 2005, at 12:03 PM, Ben Reser wrote:

> On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 01:57:57PM -0500, kfogel@collab.net wrote:
>> What would we say to rolling rc3 on Monday? Ben Reser, does that
>> work
>> for you? That would give us the weekend to vote on pending STATUS
>> items (of which there are currently 10, but only 2 or 3 have any
>> complexity to them).
>> Assuming no showstoppers, rc3 would be the final candidate,
>> essentially identical to 1.2.0, which would be released one week
>> later. Of course, were we to find a bug in rc3 severe enough to
>> warrant rc4, that would re-start the 1-week resoak.
> Monday evening works for me.

Great. So if breser posts tarballs on Monday evening (U.S.
timezones), then hopefully we'll have enough signatures to announce
rc3 sometime on Tuesday.

I'm little annoyed at the 2-3 day delays we've been having between
rolling and announcing the tarballs; maybe that's just the price of
our new signature-policy. But my impression is that we seem to get
three signatures for the .gz and .bz2 tarballs within a few hours,
and it's the win32 .zip files that are causing the multi-day delays.
Maybe we just don't have enough people who can build/test on
Windows? At the least, maybe Branko, Erik and I can prepare our
Windows systems ahead of time so that we know we're ready to run
tests on Monday night...?

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat May 7 19:11:04 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.