[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn 1.2 resoak?

From: <kfogel_at_collab.net>
Date: 2005-05-06 20:40:48 CEST

kfogel@collab.net writes:
> I'm not -1'ing the 3-week proposal. Yet. I've started reviewing all
> the merges onto the 1.2.x line between RC1 and RC2. I'd rather base
> such a decision on a close examination of the changes in question,
> than on vague, fuzzy feelings about code churn. If in the end I'm
> still jittery about a shortened soak, and want to propose a full soak,
> I'll at least have details to back it up. (One thing I wish we had
> stats for is, how many -- and what sort of -- bugs were found in 1.1.0
> during its final week of soak.) In the meantime, the clock is still
> ticking, so we're not losing any ground.

Okay, I've looked over every merge between rc1 and rc2, and the churn
wasn't nearly as bad as I thought. I've also looked at the merges
from rc2 to present, and nothing there looks very dangerous either.

So +1 on the 3-week soak, and a 1-week soak for the final tarball.
That means we should try to roll that final tarball (rc3) soon, like,
Monday? :-) I'll post a separate mail about that.

-Karl

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri May 6 21:14:26 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.