[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn 1.2 resoak?

From: Brian W. Fitzpatrick <fitz_at_red-bean.com>
Date: 2005-05-03 17:05:53 CEST

On Apr 29, 2005, at 9:48 AM, Michael Sweet wrote:

> kfogel@collab.net wrote:
>> Luis Muniz <luis.muniz@b2boost.com> writes:
>>> Yes, well people are not exactly encouraged to report a bug
>>> twice... everywhere the policy says to read first the archive.
>> That's a good point. If people are following that policy (even some
>> of the time), then I shouldn't make assumptions about how many other
>> people have encountered a bug, once someone has reported it.
> Perhaps you could update the policy to advocate posting "me, too!"
> messages to existing bug reports, so that you know how many people
> have that particular issue?

I'd be fine with this sort of thing taking place within an existing
issue (e.g. "I'm also experiencing this bug with svn 1.1.3 on FC3 while
using my laptop on a wireless connection under large trees"), but I'd
rather not spam the dev list with it.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue May 3 17:07:58 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.