[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Bug/Inconsistent Behavior in svnlook?

From: <kfogel_at_collab.net>
Date: 2005-05-02 22:25:08 CEST

Brian Huddleston <brianh@huddleston.net> writes:
> I wanted to run this past you guys as it seems strange to me. I just
> got finished converting about 5 years worth of CVS history over to
> Subversion. My weekend project is recreating some of the database
> tables our SCM uses to be consistent with Subversion pathing and our
> new repository layout.
>
> My script for repopulating the db was making use of svn info, and I
> ran across the weirdest thing.
>
> [root@alcmene bin]# svnlook info -r 30661 /svn
> mperez
> 2004-06-02 15:30:32 -0500 (Wed, 02 Jun 2004)
> svn: Inconsistent line ending style
>
> (My assumption is that some editor this dev was using mangled the line
> endings on the log message template.)
>
> However, this *does* work:
>
> [root@alcmene bin]# svnlook log -r 30661 /svn
> Active Issues:
> Resolved Issues: TA95
> Description (what changed and why): Added attribute FileFrame.
>
> My guess is, assuming I'm right about the cause, that both of these
> should behave the same way. Either it should work in both cases or it
> should error in both cases. (My extremely selfish vote being to work
> in both cases.)
>
> Is this a bug or expected behavior?

Bug, and please file (point to this mail thread in the issue).

Did you confirm that there were indeed inconsistent line endings on
that log message?

Thanks,
-Karl

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon May 2 23:01:48 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.