Re: --non-interactive still invokes editor?

kfogel@collab.net writes:

> I'm more inclined to treat this as a bug. "non-interactive" should
> mean non-interactive, and firing up an editor certainly doesn't fit
> the bill, whereas exiting with error would.
>
> Other developers: Agree? Disagree?

I suggested that in a recent thread:

http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2004-12/0992.shtml

I still think it makes sense (although one person wanted to be able to
use both --editor-cmd and --non-interactive at the same time!)

-- 
Philip Martin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org