[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Should 'svn info URL' show the owner of the lock?

From: Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman_at_collab.net>
Date: 2005-04-27 22:27:34 CEST

On Apr 27, 2005, at 3:00 PM, Jani Averbach wrote:

> On 2005-04-27 10:49-0600, Jani Averbach wrote:
>> mod_dav config:
>> <Location /xxxx>
>> DAV svn
>> SVNParentPath /xxxx/yyyy/zzzz
>> AuthzSVNAccessFile /svn_access.ini
>> AuthType Basic
>> AuthName "SVN public area"
>> AuthUserFile /..../svn_users.htpasswd
>> Require valid-user
>> </LimitExcept>
>> </Location>
> The repository isn't showing the owner of the lock because I have
> non-auth setup for read-only operations. If I remove that
> <LimitExcept> block, then 'svn info http://...' shows the owner.

That doesn't make any sense to me. Just because you issue an anonymous
PROPFIND request, why would that affect the fields that come back in
the response?

Oh. Wait. I see the bug. How emabarrassing, fix coming up.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Apr 27 22:35:25 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.