David Summers wrote:
>
> On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 kfogel@collab.net wrote:
>
>> 1.3: Server->client configuration transmission.
>>
>> 1.4: Operation logging.
>>
>> 1.5: TBD, see below
>>
>> I'd really like to see atomic
>> renames (issue #898 and possibly #895) tackled here, partly
>> because that seems a prerequisite for any merge-tracking
>> features (which is a whole other topic), and partly because
>> atomic renames are desirable in their own right.
>>
>> Atomic renames will require some discussions, see issue #898
>> for the gory details. My guess is that it wouldn't force a
>> schema change, though, and therefore could be done before 2.0.
>> But maybe there are more important things our users are
>> clamoring for? Any thoughts?
>>
>
> Personally, I would rank them:
>
> 1.3 Atomic Renames
>
> 1.4 Server->Client configuration transmission
>
> 1.5 Operation Logging
>
> ...but then I haven't been involved with Subversion coding, it is just
> my wish list comes out in that order. :-)
>
>
> --
> David Wayne Summers "Linux: Because reboots are for hardware
> upgrades!"
Hi,
Having introduced svn at a large company both me and my 200 or so devs
would like to sign that.
/Nicke
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Apr 22 23:50:55 2005