On Friday 22 April 2005 17:31, David Summers wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> > 1.3: Server->client configuration transmission.
> >
> > 1.4: Operation logging.
> >
> > 1.5: TBD, see below
> >
> > I'd really like to see atomic
> > renames (issue #898 and possibly #895) tackled here, partly
> > because that seems a prerequisite for any merge-tracking
> > features (which is a whole other topic), and partly because
> > atomic renames are desirable in their own right.
> >
> > Atomic renames will require some discussions, see issue #898
> > for the gory details. My guess is that it wouldn't force a
> > schema change, though, and therefore could be done before 2.0.
> > But maybe there are more important things our users are
> > clamoring for? Any thoughts?
>
> Personally, I would rank them:
>
> 1.3 Atomic Renames
>
> 1.4 Server->Client configuration transmission
>
> 1.5 Operation Logging
>
> ...but then I haven't been involved with Subversion coding, it is just
> my wish list comes out in that order. :-)
I'd rank them the same as you David. I'd really like to see the atomic
renames taken care of.
-John
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Apr 23 00:20:42 2005