[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r14286 - trunk/subversion/tests/clients/cmdline

From: <kfogel_at_collab.net>
Date: 2005-04-18 20:12:58 CEST

Branko Čibej <brane@xbc.nu> writes:
> lundblad@tigris.org wrote:
> >Author: lundblad
> >Date: Mon Apr 18 06:49:35 2005
> >New Revision: 14286
> >
> >Modified:
> > trunk/subversion/tests/clients/cmdline/davautocheck.sh
> >
> I'll veto any 1.2 release candidate until this non-portable script is
> moved out of this directory and into tools/test-scripts, where it
> belongs. It certainly shouldn't be in the cross-platform test
> directory. I'd move it myself, but then I might miss necessary changes
> in the script, so I'd rather let the script's maintainer do this.

A veto?? That script has been there forever. Why should this hold up
a release candidate?

-1 on your -1 :-)

I mean, I don't want to get into a veto war here, and would also like
to avoid a formal vote on the matter. But maybe I can just persuade
you that your veto is an overreaction?

Maxb and I both feel the script is fine where it is. There's nothing
wrong with having a shell script there; or if there is something
wrong, then it applies to the shell scripts in xmltests/ as well.

If you want to make the argument that there *is* a problem, fine,
let's discuss it, and change things if necessary. But veto a 1.2
release candidate over a situation that has existed since mid-2003?
That's a bit overboard!

-Karl

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Apr 18 20:42:34 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.