On Wed, 13 Apr 2005, SteveKing wrote:
> Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
>
> And yes: performance is *the* big issue here. We already had a lot of
> complaints about performance with TSVN in the past. We did everything to
> improve that performance by caching whatever is cacheable to reduce
> calls to svn_client_status() and filestat calls. So I don't like the
> idea of now adding filestat calls again which will decrease performance
> a lot (in fact, a filestat call is so expensive we got rid of them in
> our cache almost completely - we rather have the cache contain outdated
> data for some time than doing those calls).
>
Can't you cache svn:needs-lock? It will need to be invalidated only when
the last-committed-rev changes for the file.
Regards,
//Peter
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Apr 13 21:33:24 2005