Re: Suppress display of sensitive info by servers (proposal)

Justin Erenkrantz <justin@erenkrantz.com> writes:

> > That said, the common case is to create svn_error_t's via our constructor
> > functions, and I can't think of a good reason someone would be depending
> > on the size, but it is technically a violation of our compat policy.
>
> I really don't think adding a field to the end of the structure
> violates our compatibility policy. So, this doesn't warrant bumping
> the structure number. No one is likely to be allocating it themselves
> (as we provide it) and we only return a pointer to the svn_error_t not
> the structure itself.

Man, I hope so. I can't imagine how painful patch application and
backporting will be if we convert all our svn_error_t's to
svn_error_t2's.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Apr 13 20:38:06 2005