Re: Locking issues

Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU> writes:
> We went over this at great length early on. Karl wanted "svn lock
> filename" to update the file; other people (including me) wanted it to
> simply fail if the file wasn't up to date. I believe my side won the
> argument, and the planned machinery was that svn_ra_lock() would take a
> file version number (optional) so that the server could verify that the
> file is up to date when locking it. I don't know how we got off-course.

As usual, I don't remember what I argued long ago nor why, but I'm
glad your side won here.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Apr 13 05:23:44 2005