Peter N. Lundblad wrote:
>> On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, Greg Hudson wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 2005-04-11 at 20:21, Philip Martin wrote:
>>>> Using --enable-dso I get
>>>
>>>> I suppose we could make the client link against libsvn_fs explicitly,
>>>> but does that sensible for the --enable-dso case?
>>>
>>> I don't have a good answer here. :/ I'll think on it, but other
>>> people's ideas are welcome.
>>
>> Well, since we use functions from libsvn_fs in the client, I suppose we
>> should link explicitly to it. We don't drag in any of the FS
>> implementations. That's the point of --enable-dso, isn't it? (See
>> attached
>> patch. It fixes the problem for me.)
>>
>> (BTW, I don't understand why this started happening, since other
>> libraries
>> drag in libsvn_fs anyway. Is it a link ordering problem? I dunno
>> nothing.)
Works, I suppose, but seems slightly clumsy.
Before now, you could use an --enable-dso svn binary to do network RA
operations without even having a libsvn_fs binary on the computer.
The libsvn_fs dependency is really an implementation detail of ra_local.
Max.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Apr 12 14:26:49 2005