John Peacock wrote:
> Max Bowsher wrote:
>> IMO, this situation is identical to the "svn:keywords canonicalization"
>> one.
>> We have a new feature, which is broken.
>> Reverting it is an improvement over not reverting it, but fixing it
>> would be an improvement over both.
>
> That actually brings up something that I was wondering. The original
> canonicalization patch was reverted in trunk and then on 1.2.x
> (unfortunately on the day the listserv went deaf), before there was a
> chance to discuss fixes. Is this feature now dead for 1.2.0 or can the
> reversion be reverted (since the feature was originally accepted for
> 1.2.0)?
I don't know. Personally, I don't think it's of sufficient urgency to get
into 1.2.
If several people think otherwise, then it could go in.
Max.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Apr 8 17:10:28 2005