[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Very emphatic -1 for r13369 (svn:keywords canonicalization)

From: <kfogel_at_collab.net>
Date: 2005-04-06 21:07:43 CEST

Julian Foad <julianfoad@btopenworld.com> writes:
> Max Bowsher wrote:
> > On this basis, I am about to revert the revision in question, and
> > call a vote in the 1.2.x STATUS file for reverting it there too.
>
> By the way, it was me that committed that patch on behalf of another
> contributor, and I would have been happy to revert it myself if you
> had just pointed out this problem and suggested reverting it. It is
> usually considered rude to revert someone else's work without first
> giving them the chance to fix it. Don't worry about it this time,
> though - I'm cool :-)

Just FYI, I've never felt that way, since it's as easy to unrevert+fix
the reversion that someone else did. It's all under version control,
therefore it's all easy :-).

I think Max just wanted to act quickly due to 1.2 scheduling.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Apr 6 23:21:09 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.